How Have Hobbyists Historically Afforded Autodesk Software?

The Untold Story on Is Fusion 360 Free For Hobbyists Definition Of Woke Ideology You Have To Read or Be Overlooked~ $300/year is not trivial, but it's more than reasonable if you're using it for "a lot" of stuff. I would say that 10+ projects in a year is using it a lot. CAM with FIVE-AXIS milling is a lot, needing to use the cloud for rendering is a lot. Simulation, generative design and custom extensions are a lot. If you're doing all of those things, you're definitely on the far edge of "hobbyist" and should be forking over some money.

He kept all these students from gaining familiarity with the competition, encouraging them and their employers to buy licenses later for the product they had learned as a child. My point is that the marginal cost of a hobbyist user, who receives no support, is approximately zero. At no point did I say developing Fusion must have been cheap or easy! What I was trying to say is that those costs are unrelated to the number of hobbyists using the software- Autodesk does not need to hire extra engineers to let me use Fusion. (Support is the big catch here- but I don't expect support from a free tier!). Building and maintaining software costs money. The cost of hiring one engineer and paying them mid range income in Bay Area would equate to about 1000 hobbyists paying the ~$300 licensing fee per year. And it DEFINITELY costs more than one engineer to build and maintain good software. I was looking to Autodesk Fusion 360. Even opened a team for our family recently. I decided on that after looking at FreeCAD, Solvespace, OpenSCAD, LibreCAD, and a few others, each of which had a fundamental dealbreaker. Perhaps it will have to be FreeCAD after all. So, IMHO I _REALLY_ want an opensource solidworks/fusion360/etc competitor but at the moment its just not there yet. From the video's it looks like it should be, but once you start using it, its an endless ball of frustration. FreeCAD lets you do parametric modelling. Well as seeing all of your changes while you're making them. Also it's much more point-and-clicky, in the same way Fusion is, so it's much less confusing for a Fusion user to transition to FreeCAD rather than OpenSCAD. That said, OpenSCAD is phenomenally powerful, it just requires you to think in a particular way. I happen to enjoy thinking that way. Most of what I make ends up being OpenSCAD. I mostly use OpenSCAD to design parts, and FreeCAD to design assemblies and integrate parts into existing things. The most popular platforms also are more in demand for jobs.

Take a look at all thedifferent file types supported in Fusion 360. Autodesk Fusion 360 is a collaborative, cloud-enabled design platform that has all of the features mentioned above and more. It includes all the tools you need to go from design to fabrication, without having to leave the tool. Service providers, resellers, contract manufacturers and consultants doing work for other companies do not qualify for Fusion 360 for startups. Applicants can apply to extend their licence at the end of each 1 year term, as long as they continue to meet all qualifications. Businesses must design or manufacture their own physical products. Be willing to share their story with the Fusion 360 community. Showing the program as posted by fusion 360Using replace to change the retract height line to a rapid move. Fusion will replace these with a G01 or G1 command, meaning your machine will only run at your programmed feedrate instead of a time saving rapid move. The recent changes to the personal use version are, in my opinion, not a deal breaker. If you are only using it for a hobby, the functionality is more than adequate. Signing up for Fusion 360 for the first time is very straightforward. Simply go to the sign up page for the personal use license. Click the β€˜get started’ button. Because Fusion is a fully functioning β€œindustrial grade” Cad/Cam program you will get to learn how trained machinis